<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stand Up for the Chalmers Building</title>
	<atom:link href="http://flippinamsterdam.wordpress.com/2008/05/06/stand-up-for-the-chalmers-building/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://flippinamsterdam.wordpress.com/2008/05/06/stand-up-for-the-chalmers-building/</link>
	<description>My take on the Pythonesque experience of living in Amsterdam, NY with excursions into politics, economics, rationality, banality, lunacy, idiocy and policy.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 23:55:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chalmers Redux &#171; Flippin&#8217; Amsterdam NY</title>
		<link>http://flippinamsterdam.wordpress.com/2008/05/06/stand-up-for-the-chalmers-building/#comment-367</link>
		<dc:creator>Chalmers Redux &#171; Flippin&#8217; Amsterdam NY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 14:36:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flippinamsterdam.wordpress.com/?p=7#comment-367</guid>
		<description>[...] kaufman &#124; &#160;  I posted a while back on my support for the repurposing of the Chalmers building (here). I&#8217;d like to reemphasize a point in my piece(emphasis [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] kaufman | &nbsp;  I posted a while back on my support for the repurposing of the Chalmers building (here). I&#8217;d like to reemphasize a point in my piece(emphasis [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I Suck &#171; Flippin&#8217; Amsterdam NY</title>
		<link>http://flippinamsterdam.wordpress.com/2008/05/06/stand-up-for-the-chalmers-building/#comment-131</link>
		<dc:creator>I Suck &#171; Flippin&#8217; Amsterdam NY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 16:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flippinamsterdam.wordpress.com/?p=7#comment-131</guid>
		<description>[...] guess what&#8217;s upsetting to Mr. Lazarou was my criticism of his piece on the Chalmers building. I happened to advocate for Kaufman&#8217;s proposal to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] guess what&#8217;s upsetting to Mr. Lazarou was my criticism of his piece on the Chalmers building. I happened to advocate for Kaufman&#8217;s proposal to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: worker in schenectady</title>
		<link>http://flippinamsterdam.wordpress.com/2008/05/06/stand-up-for-the-chalmers-building/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>worker in schenectady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 20:17:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flippinamsterdam.wordpress.com/?p=7#comment-7</guid>
		<description>With Golubs new HQ and GE hiring more people and the eventual arrival of SemaTech and perhaps AMD, Amsterdam is in a good spot for people to live who embrace some thing besides the clifton parks of the world.

Sure, it is not a layup communte, but it is on the river and might have some romance to a buyer.

You need a mix of resy and decent shops/cafes to draw some folks and I think that you need the livable units first and let the entrepreneurs come shortly after with their cafe&#039;s and restaurants.

If you are a possible cafe owner, would you rather take a risk with no plans for upscale clients, or when there is a plan?

Others in urban planning say to bring in the eats and art galleries first and the rest will follow...it is a fine line. But it is not like Amsterdam is detroit either</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With Golubs new HQ and GE hiring more people and the eventual arrival of SemaTech and perhaps AMD, Amsterdam is in a good spot for people to live who embrace some thing besides the clifton parks of the world.</p>
<p>Sure, it is not a layup communte, but it is on the river and might have some romance to a buyer.</p>
<p>You need a mix of resy and decent shops/cafes to draw some folks and I think that you need the livable units first and let the entrepreneurs come shortly after with their cafe&#8217;s and restaurants.</p>
<p>If you are a possible cafe owner, would you rather take a risk with no plans for upscale clients, or when there is a plan?</p>
<p>Others in urban planning say to bring in the eats and art galleries first and the rest will follow&#8230;it is a fine line. But it is not like Amsterdam is detroit either</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
